There can occasionally be a fine line between a sensible exotic pet and a bad choice. You could succeed with a substantial primate, and someone else might have to stay with something much more compact such as a mouse. Then again, we might not even have an unrestricted option as to what creatures we would like to raise. The state wherein we reside might make part of that decision for all of us.
When those who own exotic pets do not maintain or manage them correctly, it affects lots of people. The circumstance can become unsafe as it did a while ago in Ohio. A man had lions and tigers on his farm, and he made a decision to permit them to go free. This was bad news for the people who were not far away, and it was worse news for the pets.
The police had to take control, therefore they shot and killed the animals. Seemingly, they did not have the time to locate and utilize a tranquilizer device. This brought about varying sentiments locally since it was a distressing state of affairs, and an even sadder situation happened later.
The recent law says that present-day exotic pet owners in Ohio must get licenses for them. Before they can acquire the license, they have to establish their worthiness to have the pet; that is, worthiness in accordance to Ohio law. The state government must undoubtedly think they are executing what’s right, however, this appears like overkill.
A arrest background check is part of that merit verification. The pet keeper also needs to insure the animal: doubtless to protect against personal harm and property damage. And the possessor needs to have a micro-chip set up in the animal so that it might be followed if it runs off. That is real big of you, brother.
That range of things mentioned above may perhaps place a hardship on today’s owners: particularly in this economic crisis. Pet owners must pay to have their legal history checked, to acquire the insurance coverage and to have the implant put in place. So if they cannot find the money for these things, what happens to the pets? If the area animal park or some comparable institution does not need them, the pet may well require being put down.
Another thing that is happening is that individuals who do not currently take care of foreign pets are forbidden to do so from here out. There is one exception to the new rules: Individuals will be allowed to have snakes, even if they are venomous or large, as in the case of the huge python.
These laws disappoint lots of people who truly feel they have the legal right to do what they want in their own households and on their own land as long as they do it sensibly. They feel that someone else’s carelessness is absolutely no justification to infringe on their rights. So what are your thoughts? Where do you draw the line between apparent precautions and an individual’s rights?
Stephen loves to teach new exotic pet owners how to breed leopard geckos. Visit his blog to read about the world’s most interesting reptiles
